Can you elaborate on that?
Gaub: The state can improve the framework conditions. Ultimately, however, politics, business, science and civil society share this responsibility. It is about identifying the key challenges of the coming decades, developing long-term perspectives – and defining the necessary steps for the future in clear and concrete terms. This gives people more stability than simple promises. Our problem is not a lack of security, but rather a lack of creativity and willingness to innovate in dealing with what is to come.
What exactly does this mean for companies?
Gaub: They have a special responsibility here. They can develop precisely these visions in their respective areas, alone or in conjunction with other stakeholders. What problems will need to be solved in the next 20, 30 or 50 years? What specific steps need to be taken to address these problems?
Artificial intelligence is the central buzzword and the key technology of the future. Are we as a society and as one of the world’s largest economies prepared for a successful AI future?
Gaub: I don’t find the question of whether we are “prepared” helpful. It quickly leads to a simple yes or no answer. In my view, something else is crucial: Do we have a clear understanding of which areas of artificial intelligence we can still develop in Germany?
We are lagging behind in large generative language models and will hardly be able to catch up with American companies. But there is considerable potential in the fields of healthcare, industry and education.
Unfortunately, in Europe we are still focusing heavily on the risks presented by AI and tend to overregulate it. Of course, there are sensitive areas, such as in the military or police sector, where we have to act with caution. But at the same time, there is enormous potential in other areas.
Therefore, I would say: We are not unprepared due to a lack of ability, but because we are allowing fear dominate the debate. Instead of constantly focusing on new concerns, we need a constructive examination of the possibilities of this technology and a clear answer to the question of which areas we want to be at the forefront of. We need this vision.